cyberjesus,
I have sent you a pm
Doug
satan and nvl recommended that i start this thread.
i'm not sure anyone will have interest.
but one of the things that proves to me that the bible is accurate is the prophecies that were written before the fullfillment, in detal.
cyberjesus,
I have sent you a pm
Doug
hi,.
i need to obtain scans of the following pages, and i would be deeply grateful if someone can help me.. anchor bible dictionary, volume 6 pages 392-393 ("tetragrammaton in the new testament", article by george howard.).
if anyone can help me, it would probably be best to send me a pm, so i can pass on my email address.. doug.
Hi,
I need to obtain scans of the following pages, and I would be deeply grateful if someone can help me.
Anchor Bible Dictionary, Volume 6 pages 392-393 ("Tetragrammaton in the New Testament", article by George Howard.)
If anyone can help me, it would probably be best to send me a pm, so I can pass on my email address.
Doug
the evidence for some form of evolution -- and the age of earth and life upon it -- is mounting almost daily.
how long can the wts insulate its followers from the incontrovertible evidence without lapsing into total irrelevance?
what do you think?.
simon17,
You wrote: "The 607/587 thing doesn't matter because there is NO information that people come across regarding this."
The 607/587 thing is critical to the authority of the WTS and to its Governing Body. They claim to be the sole earthly representative on earth of Jehovah's Government that began to rule towards earth in 1914. That date is based on a calculation that includes 607 BCE for the destruction of Jerusalem. This is the reason WTS apologists rise so strongly to defend that date. See how much effort their JW doyen Furuli expends on the subject.
I suggest the reason that JWs are not provided with any information is to keep them in the dark. It's a form of "theocratic war strategy" being waged by the WTS towards its followers. The WTS is seeing an increase (modest and certainly not spectacular) which could be jeopardised should the sheep be advised that there is a need to defend the date. Keep it quiet, sweep it under the carpet, keep the troops ignorant, and it will go away and not cause a problem.
When is the last time you have seen a detailed defence of 1914 based on the chronology and interpretations of Daniel 4, Ezekiel and Jeremiah that they employ?
Doug
who was the first christian writer to apply isaiah 9:6 to jesus?.
i mean as a direct quotation, not as an allusion.. doug.
Leo,
Thank you.
I cannot find any NT writer directly quoting Isa 9:6, but someone could enlighten me in that regard.
Doug
jookbeard wrote:.
"they are globally united in their beliefs;.
not true there are many splinter groups and sects of the wts and they have the worse retention rates of any man made religious cult on the planet".
One of the earliest splinters still meets near me. They were formed in 1909 when CTR's first emissary to Australia, Henninges and his wife Rose (of certain notoriety) defected and formed the New Covenant Fellowship. They are buried at nearby Burwood cemetery.
"Somewhere" I have a copy of a letter written about the time complaining that Rutherford was illegally wresting power and control of the WTS. You only need read of Rutherford's physical abuse towards those who had legitimate right in accordance with CTR's will.
Rutherford was not named in CTR's will as a primary inheritor to leadership of the WTS.
http://www.jwstudies.com/WILL_AND_TESTAMENT_OF_CHARLES_TAZE_RUSSELL.pdf
During CTR's time, the organisation was democratic, but Rutherford was intent on creating an autocratic top-down "theocracy" in which his right to rule could not be challenged. While in jail in 1919, Rutherford was deeply troubled by the potential outcome of the voting and he vowed to change the system, which he achieved.
A Google search for each of the names mentioned in CTR's will reveals the history of some of the numerous splinters that formed following CT's death.
Doug
who was the first christian writer to apply isaiah 9:6 to jesus?.
i mean as a direct quotation, not as an allusion.. doug.
PS,
Maybe, but I need to see a reliable source
I do not know the answer. That is the reason for my question.
Doug
the evidence for some form of evolution -- and the age of earth and life upon it -- is mounting almost daily.
how long can the wts insulate its followers from the incontrovertible evidence without lapsing into total irrelevance?
what do you think?.
I find it stunning that this should be an issue in a First World country.
Is this a major issue in any other "advanced" country?
How can a community that is so advanced in and reliant on technology and scientific knowledge be taken in by stories written about 800 BCE by people who had a totally wrong cosmology?
Which of those ancient writers was a witness to the stories they wrote and rewrote?
Which story is correct, Genesis 1 (with El and the Elohim) or Genesis 2 (with YHWH / HWHY)?
Why did the Yahwist writers provide a different and conflicting account to the story written by the "Elohist" (priestly) writers?
Doug
who was the first christian writer to apply isaiah 9:6 to jesus?.
i mean as a direct quotation, not as an allusion.. doug.
Who was the first Christian writer to apply Isaiah 9:6 to Jesus?
I mean as a direct quotation, not as an allusion.
Doug
a long-awaited review by professor h. hunger, foremost authority on babylonian astronomical cuneiform tablets, of dr. r. furuli's assyrian, babylonian, and egyptian chronology.
volume ii of assyrian, babylonian, egyptian, and persian chronology compared with the chronology of the bible is now available to read for anyone who is interested.
you can find it at http://goto.glocalnet.net/kf4/reviewhunger.htm.
Billy,
You will be pleased to know that the process you describe is being presented at:
http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/jehovahs-witness/TPHQURFQA6VOL3BP1
Doug
the following is part of the decree on the cyrus cylinder, now in the british museum:.
i am cyrus, king of the universe, the great king, the powerful king, king of babylon, king of sumer and akkad, king of the four quarters of the world, son of cambyses, the great king, king of the city of anshan, grandson of cyrus, the great king, ki[ng of the ci]ty of anshan, descendant of teispes, the great king, king of the city of anshan, the perpetual seed of kingship, whose reign bel (marduk) and nabu love, and with whose kingship, to their joy, they concern themselves.. .
when i went as harbinger of peace i[nt]o babylon i founded my sovereign residence within the palace amid celebration and rejoicing.
Prodigal Son,
What does it do to your understanding of History Writing by the Hebrews?
Remember, the only things we know about them comes from the elite, the people who could write. We only read their side of the story.
Have you read "Who Wrote the Bible?" by Richard Elliott Friedman?
While that book deals with the OT, the situation with the NT is equally fascinating.
Doug